polthand.blogg.se

Adobe reader 10.1 4
Adobe reader 10.1 4












adobe reader 10.1 4
  1. #Adobe reader 10.1 4 pro#
  2. #Adobe reader 10.1 4 series#

The StudioBook is thus slower on battery power than the MacBook Pro 16 with its M2 Max, where there is no performance reduction on battery power. In the CB R23 multi-test, it scores only 11,576 points, which corresponds to a deficit of 63%. In terms of single-core performance, the Core i9 is also ahead of the new AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, but the latter offers even more performance in the multi-core tests while also working more efficiently.Īway from the socket, not much remains to be seen of the laptop's performance capabilities as the CPU is only allowed to consume a meager 34/26 watts here. In large gaming notebooks, the CPU operates a little faster, but compared to the comparison group with normal Intel CPUs or the Apple M2 Max, the Studiobook has a big advantage. In the Studiobook, the processor consumes up to ~170 watts and levels off at 130 watts after a few minutes of sustained load.

adobe reader 10.1 4

This offers 8 fast performance cores and 16 efficiency cores, which is why the chip is able to process a total of 32 threads simultaneously.

#Adobe reader 10.1 4 series#

Intel's current high-end model of the Raptor Lake series for notebooks, the Core i9-13980HX, is used as the processor.














Adobe reader 10.1 4